However, the above observation is without prejudice to the legal rights of your parties, arising out of the over marriage from the few, if any, pending before the competent court of law. Read more

The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all assure legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; Should the parents in the boy or Woman usually do not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the pair is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary for the determination with the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but aren't technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

This is because transfer orders are typically regarded as within the administrative discretion in the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is motivated by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, they may have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court will be the highest court in the United States. Decreased courts within the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related into the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its very own judicial system that features trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is commonly referred to because the “supreme” court, Whilst there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, While state courts may also generally hear cases involving federal laws.

However it truly is made distinct that police is free to just take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain regard from the family lose in accordance with law and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall protected concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate as being a issue of security of your house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has long been accomplished. check here Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated previously mentioned. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling about the same form of case.

Article 27 with the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination with the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is from the very clear negation on the law laid down from the Supreme Court in its several pronouncements. Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 days with the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided because of the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

As being the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its primary purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more